End-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure to assess the value of passive leg-raising test in predicting volume responsiveness in patients with septic shock / 中华危重病急救医学

Objective:To investigate the value of partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (P ETCO 2) combined with passive leg raising test (PLR) in predicting volume responsiveness in patients with septic shock. Methods:A total of 43 patients with septic shock admitted to the second department of critical care medicine, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region from December 2019 to June 2021 were selected as the research subjects. P ETCO 2, cardiac index (CI), stroke volume variation (SVV), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and other hemodynamic indexes were monitored before and after PLR and volume stress test (VE). Subjects were grouped according to the CI variation rate (ΔCI) after VE test. Patients with ΔCI ≥ 15% were the responding group, and patients with ΔCI < 15% were the non-responding group. The receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) was drawn to analyze the evaluation value of the change in P ETCO 2 after PLR on the evaluation value of fluid responsiveness. Results:Among the 43 patients, 22 cases were in the responding group, accounting for 51.2%; 21 cases were in the non-responding group, accounting for 48.8%. After the PLR test, the change values of MAP, SVV, CI and P ETCO 2 in the responding group were higher than those in the non-responding group, and the differences were statistically significant [MAP (mmHg): 3.8±2.1 vs. 1.4±2.0, SVV (%): -5.3±2.5 vs. 2.7±2.0, CI (mL·s -1·m -2): 0.48±0.13 vs. 0.14±0.18, P ETCO 2 (mmHg): 3.4±1.8 vs. 1.1±1.0, all P < 0.05, 1 mmHg≈0.133 kPa]. After the VE test, the changes of HR, MAP, SVV, CI and P ETCO 2 in the responding group were higher than those in the non-responding group [HR (times/min): -8.3±2.8 vs. -2.3±3.7, MAP (mmHg): 3.8±2.4 vs. 1.2±1.7, SVV (%): -6.3±3.1 vs. -3.3±2.0, CI (mL·s -1·m -2): 0.51±0.14 vs. 0.16±0.12, P ETCO 2 (mmHg): 3.3±1.2 vs. 1.3±1.1, all P < 0.05]. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the change in P ETCO 2 before and after the PLR test (ΔP ETCO 2 PLR) for evaluating fluid responsiveness was 0.881. When the critical value was 5.9%, the sensitivity was 76.7%, the specificity was 89.5%, and the correct index was 0.68; the AUC for SVV baseline assessment of fluid responsiveness was 0.835, and when the cut-off value was 12.8%, the sensitivity was 84.6%, the specificity was 80.0%, and the correct index was 0.65. The predictive value of ΔP ETCO 2 was not lower than the SVV baseline. Conclusion:After the PLR test, the change of P ETCO 2 can be used as a non-invasive, simple, safe and reliable indicator for predicting the volume responsiveness of patients with septic shock.

Clinical study of internal jugular vein dilatation index in predicting septic shock volume responsiveness / 中华急诊医学杂志

Objective:To explore the value of severe ultrasound measurement of internal jugular vein dilation index (ΔIJV) combined with passive leg raising (PLR) in predicting the volume responsiveness of septic shock.Methods:Patients diagnosed with septic shock under complete mechanical ventilation in the ICU of Jinshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University from January 2020 to March 2021 were prospectively selected as the research objects. After 500 mL crystals were injected within 30 min, the patients having the "gold standard" left stroke volume (SV) increased by 15% were allocated to the volume response positive group, and patient having an SV increased by less than 15% to the volume response negative group. First, the maximum anterior posterior diameter (IJV max) and the minimum anterior posterior diameter (IJV min) in the respiratory cycle of internal jugular vein were measured by ultrasound, then SV before and after PLR was measured, and finally SV, IJV max and IJV min were measured again after rapid infusion of 500 mL crystals, and ΔIJV=(IJV max-IJV min)/(IJV mean)×100%. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare the hemodynamic indexes before and after capacity expansion and PLR. Spearman rank method was used to analyze the change rate of SV (ΔSV) after PLR and the correlation between ΔIJV and ΔSV of the "gold standard". The sensitivity, specificity and relevant cut-off values were obtained by drawing the subject function curve to evaluate the value of ΔIJV and PLR in predicting the volume responsiveness of patients with sepsis. Results:A total of 56 patients were enrolled in the study, and they were divided into two groups: 32 patients in the volume response positive group and 24 patients in the volume response negative group. There was a positive correlation between ΔIJV and ΔSV after capacity expansion ( r=0.778, P<0.01). Taking ΔIJV>17.3% as the threshold, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.846 (95% CI: 0.716~0.977), the sensitivity was 84.4% and the specificity was 83.3%. PLR was also positively correlated with ΔSV ( r=0.698, P<0.01). Taking ΔSV>15.5% after PLR as the threshold, the AUC was 0.895 (95% CI: 0.796~0.993), the sensitivity was 96.9%, and the specificity was 79.2%. When ΔIJV combined with PLR predicted volume reactivity, the AUC was 0.944 (95% CI: 0.862~1.000), the sensitivity was 99.8% and the specificity was 87.5%. Conclusions:The measurement of internal jugular vein respiratory dilation index by bedside ultrasound is a reliable index to predict volume responsiveness in patients with sepsis. When combined with PLR, the sensitivity and specificity of prediction can be improved.

Clinical value of point of care ultrasound on cardiac output and volume responsiveness in patients with septic shock / 中华危重病急救医学

Objective:To assess the value of point of care ultrasound on cardiac output (CO) and volume responsiveness in patients with septic shock.Methods:A prospective investigation study was conducted. Twenty-four mechanical ventilation patients with septic shock who needed pulse-indicated continuous cardiac output (PiCCO) monitoring in the department of critical care medicine of Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital from November 25, 2020 to April 30, 2021 were selected as the subjects, the patient's basic information and laboratory test results were recorded. PiCCO was used as standard to monitor CO and stroke volume variability (SVV) at 0, 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours. At the same time, point of care transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was used to measure velocity time integral (VTI) and inferior vena cava diameter (dIVC), the CO, VTI variation rate (△VTI) and dIVC variation rate (△dIVC) were calculated. Then, using the value monitored by PiCCO as the standard, the consistency and correlation analysis were carried out between point of care ultrasound with PiCCO.Results:Twenty-two out of 24 patients obtained satisfactory ultrasound Doppler images, the heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and body temperature of the enrolled patients were consistent with the pathophysiological characteristics of septic shock. With the extension of treatment time, HR and CO both gradually decreased, and MAP gradually increased, reaching a peak or trough at 48 hours after admission. The difference were statistically significant compared with the time of admission [HR (bpm): 90.36±15.35 vs. 116.82±19.82, MAP (mmHg, 1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa): 87.82±11.06 vs. 58.82±9.85, CO (L/min): 4.80±0.56 vs. 6.78±1.31, all P < 0.05]. The CO obtained by PiCCO and point of care ultrasound had good agreement [5.36 (4.78, 6.33) L/min and 5.21 (4.88, 6.35) L/min, respectively], the average difference value at each time point was (-0.02±0.69) L/min, the 95% agreement limit range was -1.35-1.34, and there was a high degree of correlation ( rs = 0.800, P < 0.001); The SVV by PiCCO and the △dIVC by point of care ultrasound were in good agreement [18.00% (14.00%, 24.00%) and 21.00% (14.00%, 25.75%), respectively], the average difference value at the time point was (-3.16±6.89)%, the 95% agreement limit range was -16.89-10.54, and there was a moderate correlation ( rs = 0.702, P < 0.001); The SVV by PiCCO and the △VTI by point of care ultrasound were in good agreement [18.00% (14.00%, 24.00%) and 16.00% (11.25%, 20.75%), respectively], the average difference value at each time point was (13.03±14.75)%, and the 95% agreement limit range was 1.72-27.78, and there was a high correlation ( rs = 0.918, P < 0.001). Conclusion:Point of care ultrasound can accurately assess CO and volume responsiveness of patients with septic shock, and the △VTI is better than the △dIVC in assessing volume responsiveness.

Application progress of point-of-care ultrasound monitoring inferior vena cava in volume management of critically ill patients / 中华危重病急救医学

Determining whether patients have volume-responsiveness is one of the frequently asked questions in the intensive care unit, especially in shock patients. Evaluating the volume status and volume responsiveness can help clinical medical staff accurately grasp the patient's cardiac preload, guide reasonable volume management, and help improve patient prognosis. Therefore, many non-invasive and invasive methods have been proposed to evaluate volume responsiveness. Inferior vena cava ultrasound has been widely used to guide the fluid management of critically ill patients due to its simplicity, non-invasiveness, and good repeatability. This article reviews the clinical applications of inferior vena cava ultrasound in fluid management of critically ill patients, so as to provide a reference for circulatory management of critically ill patients.

Passive leg raising combined with echocardiography could evaluate volume responsiveness in patients with septic shock / 中华危重病急救医学

Objective To assess the value of passive leg raising (PLR) combined with echocardiography in predicting volume responsiveness in patients with septic shock. Methods Thirty septic shock patients with spontaneous respiration admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) of Tianjin First Center Hospital from July 2016 to August 2018 were enrolled. PLR and volume expansion (VE) were performed successively. The hemodynamic parameters including left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), stroke volume (SV) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) before PLR (baseline level), after PLR, immediately after VE were examined by echocardiography, and the central venous pressure (CVP) was monitored. The patients with increase in SV after VE (ΔSV) ≥ 15% were served as reaction group, while ΔSV < 15% were served as non-reaction group. The changes in LVEDV, LVESV, SV, LVEF and CVP at baseline level, after PLR and after VE were compared between the two groups. Pearson correlation method was used to analyze the correlation between ΔSV, increase in LVEF (ΔLVEF) after PLR and ΔSV, and ΔLVEF after VE. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to evaluate the predictive value of ΔSV and ΔLVEF after PLR for volume responsiveness. Results PLR and VE were successfully performed in 30 patients, of which 23 patients (76.7%) were enrolled in the reaction group, and 7 patients (23.3%) in the non-reaction group. Compared with baseline levels, LVEDV, SV, and LVEF in the reaction group were significantly increased after PLR [LVEDV (mL): 83.5±9.6 vs. 77.1±6.2, SV (mL): 48.5±5.6 vs. 43.2±4.9, LVEF: 0.58±0.04 vs. 0.56±0.06, all P < 0.05], and CVP was significantly increased after VE [cmH2O (1 cmH2O = 0.098 kPa): 7.4±3.3 vs. 4.6±0.7, P < 0.01], however, there was no significant change in LVESV. In the non-reaction group, SV and LVEF were significantly increased after PLR as compared with those at baseline levels [SV (mL): 42.7±3.7 vs. 40.6±3.1, LVEF: 0.52±0.05 vs. 0.50±0.05, both P < 0.05], while LVEDV and CVP were significantly increased after VE as compared with those at baseline levels [LVEDV (mL): 84.4±4.1 vs. 80.6±5.9, CVP (cmH2O): 10.6±3.5 vs. 7.6±0.5, both P < 0.05], however, there was no significant change in LVESV. Pearson correlation analysis showed that ΔSV and ΔLVEF after PLR were positively correlated with ΔSV and ΔLVEF after VE (r1 = 0.86, r2 = 0.65, both P < 0.01). ROC curve analysis showed that the area under ROC curve (AUC) of PLR-induced ΔSV and ΔLVEF for predicting volume responsiveness was 0.85 and 0.66 respectively. When the cut-off value of ΔSV after PLR was 10.6%, the sensitivity was 78.2%, the specificity was 82.3%; when the cut-off value of ΔLVEF after PLR was 3.6%, the sensitivity was 78.2%, and the specificity was 73.2%. Conclusion ΔSV and ΔLVEF measured by PLR combined with echocardiography can be used to evaluate the volume responsiveness in patients with septic shock and can guide fluid therapy.

Evaluation of volume responsiveness by pulse pressure variability and inferior vena cava dispensability index at different tidal volumes by mechanical ventilation

This study investigated the effects of tidal volume (TV) on the diagnostic value of pulse pressure variation (PPV) and the inferior vena cava dispensability index (IVC-DI) for volume responsiveness during mechanical ventilation. In patients undergoing elective surgery with mechanical ventilation, different TVs of 6, 9, and 12 mL/kg were given for two min. The left ventricular outflow tract velocity-time integral (VTI) was measured by transthoracic echocardiography. The IVC-DI was measured at sub-xyphoid transabdominal long axis. The PPV was measured via the radial artery and served as baseline. Index measurements were repeated after fluid challenge. VTI increased by more than 15% after fluid challenge, which was considered as volume responsive. Seventy-nine patients were enrolled, 38 of whom were considered positive volume responsive. Baseline data between the response group and the non-response group were similar. Receiver operating characteristic curve confirmed PPV accuracy in diagnosing an increase in volume responsiveness with increased TV. When TV was 12 mL/kg, the PPV area under the curve (AUC) was 0.93 and the threshold value was 15.5%. IVC-DI had the highest diagnostic accuracy at a TV of 9 mL/kg and an AUC of 0.79, with a threshold value of 15.3%. When TV increased to 12 mL/kg, the IVC-DI value decreased. When the TV was 9 and 12 mL/kg, PPV showed improved performance in diagnosing volume responsiveness than did IVC-DI. PPV diagnostic accuracy in mechanically ventilated patients was higher than IVC-DI. PPV accuracy in predicting volume responsiveness was increased by increasing TV.

The predictive value of cardiopulmonary interaction monitoring technology on volume responsiveness in septic shock patients / 中华急诊医学杂志

Objective To assess the predictive value of cardiopulmonary interaction monitoring technology on volume responsiveness in septic shock patients.Methods A cohort of 45 septic shock patients treated with mechanical ventilation at First People's Hospital of Nantong City from January 2016 to June 2017 were prospectively selected.The hemodynamic variables including heart rate (HR),systolic pressure (SBP),mean arterial pressure (MAP),central venous pressure (CVP),cardiac index (CI),stroke volume variability (SVV),and pulse pressure variability (PPV) were monitored.PEEP elevation test,end-expiratory occlusion test and volume expansion were sequential conducted.Volume responsiveness was defined as an increase in CI (△CI) of 15％ or greater after volume expansion,namely the response group (△CI ≥ 15％) and non-response group (△CI＜15％).Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to indicate the predictive value of cardiopulmonary interaction monitoring technology in septic shock patients.The best cut-off value was assessed by Youden Index,and sensitivity and specificity were calculated respectively.Results There were 24 patients in the response group and 21 patients in the non-response group.There were no significant differences in basic clinical data between the two groups.△fter PEEP elevation test,CVP increased significantly,while SBP and CI decreased significantly in both groups (P＜0.05).The degrees of △SBP and △CI in the response group were much higher than those in the non-response group (P＜0.05).After end-expiratory occlusion test,CVP decreased significantly,while SBP,MAP and CI increased significantly in both groups (P＜0.05).The degrees of △MAP and △CI in the response group were much higher than those in the non-response group (P＜0.05).SVV and PPV in the response group were higher than those in the non-response group (P＜0.05).The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the △SBP and △CI after PEEP elevation test and △MAP and △CI after end-expiratory occlusion test were 0.737 (95％CI:0.581-0.89;P＜0.05),0.803 (95％CI:0.660-0.946;P＜0.05),0.763 (95％CI:0.617-0.908;P＜0.05),and 0.808 (95％CI:0.673-0.942;P＜0.05),respectively.These AUC values were higher than or similar to traditional indicators,such as SVV and PPV.The best cut-off value of △CI and △SBP after PEEP elevation test was 12％ and 9.5％,yielding a sensitivity and specificity of 70.8％and 95.2％,75％ and 71.4％,respectively.The best cut-off value of △CI and △MAP after end-expiratory occlusion test was 8.5％ and 5.5％,yielding a sensitivity and specificity of 79.2％ and 76.2％,75％ and 76.2％ respectively.Conclusion △SBP and △CI after PEEP elevation test and △MAP and △CI after endexpiratory occlusion test can accurately predict volume responsiveness in septic shock patients.

Clinical study on pleth variability index for monitoring volume responsiveness in patients undergoing intestinal tract surgery / 重庆医学

Objective To evaluate the ability of pleth variability index(PVI) for predicting volume responsiveness after general anesthesia induction intubation in the patients undergoing intestinal tract surgery with the velocity-time integral(VTI) of left ventricular outflow tract blood monitored by transthoracic echocardiography as the standard.Methods Twenty-five patients undergoing intestinal tract surgery were selected.After general anesthesia induction,7 mL/kg colloidal solution was infused before operation beginning,if the VTI increased percentage(△VTI％)≥10 ％,200 mL colloidal solution was infused by 50mL syringe until △VTI％＜10％;the hemodynamic indicators of MAP,CVP,HR,PI VTI and PVI were recorded before and after infusion solution.Results The PVI basic value in the patients with response was significantly higher than that in the patients without response(P＜0.05);the Pearson correlation analysis found that there was a significant linear correlation between PVI basic value and △VTI％ before infusion solution(P＜0.05);the optimal diagnostic threshold value of PVI was 13.51,its sensitivity for monitoring the volume responsiveness was 69.25％ and specificity was 70.00％.The area under the receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve(AUC) was 0.75(95％ CI:0.63-0.88,P＜0.01).Conclusion PVI can predict the volume responsiveness in the patients undergoing intestinal tract surgery.The PVI value ＞13.51 indicates that the patient may be in hypovolemia status and needs the volume therapy.

The study on the ratio of carotid artery/vein cross-sectional area measured by ultrasound to evaluate volume responsiveness / 中华急诊医学杂志

Objective To investigate the application of the cross-sectional area ratio of internal jugular vein and common carotid artery (IJV/CCA) in the evaluating the volume responsiveness of critically ill patients. Methods The capacity of critically ill patients were prospectively assessed. The diameter and sectional area of the IJV and CCA were measured by bedside ultrasonography. The cross-sectional area ratio of IJV/CCA was calculated and compared with the variety of cardiac output (ΔCO) after passive leg raising (PLR). Then the correlation index between the cross-sectional area ratio of IJV/CCA and ΔCO was evaluated, and the sensitivity and specificity parameters of capacity status were assessed by the cross-sectional area ratio of IJV/CCA. Results Of 55 critically ill patients in this study, 34 cases had positive volume responsiveness, and 21 case negative volume responsiveness.The general clinical data of the two groups had no statistically significant difference. The cross-sectional area ratio of IJV/CCA in the positive group was significantly less than that of the negative group (1.38±0.55 vs. 2.16±0.68, P<0.01). There was a significant correlation between the IJV/CCA cross-sectional area ratio and the ΔCO value of PLR (r=-0.67, P<0.01). When the ratio of the cross-sectional area of IJV/CCA was 1.65, the sensitivity of the assessment capacity was 86.4％ and the specificity was 78.8％. Conclusions The use of portable bedside ultrasonography is a noninvasive, convenient and reliable method to evaluate the capacity state of the critically ill patients.

Comparison of effect of norepinephrine and terlipressin on patients with ARDS combined with septic shock: a prospective single-blind randomized controlled trial / 中华危重病急救医学

Objective To approach the effect of different vasopressor on hemodynamics, volume responsiveness, fluid volume balance, renal function and prognosis in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) complicated with septic shock.Methods A prospective single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted. ARDS patients with septic shock admitted to the Department of Critical Care Medicine of Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital from January 1st, 2015 to May 1st, 2016 were enrolled. The patients satisfied ARDS Berlin diagnostic criteria, over 15 years old, needing vasopressor after fluid resuscitation were enrolled. The patients were divided into norepinephrine group (NE group) and terlipressin group (TP group) by randomise number table derived by computer. Patients in TP group were given terlipressin (0.01-0.04 U/min) with an intravenous pump, while those of NE group were given norepinephrine (> 1μg/min) with an intravenous pump, and the target mean arterial pressure (MAP) was maintained at 65-75 mmHg (1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa). Hemodynamics and extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) were monitored by pulse indicator continuous cardiac output (PiCCO). The volume responsiveness of patient was evaluated by passive leg raising (PLR) test, and cardiac index (CI) change (ΔCI ≥ 10%) served as positive volume responsiveness. The differences in hemodynamics, EVLWI, oxygenation index (OI), lactate clearance rate (LCR), rate of positive volume responsiveness, urinary output, fluid volume balance, renal function, and prognostic indicators were compared between the two groups.Results Fifty-seven patients with ARDS complicated with septic shock were enrolled, with 26 patients in NE group, and 31 patients in TP group, thebaseline data in both groups was balanced with comparability. Compare with NE group, 48-hour and 72-hour heart rate (HR) in TP group was significantly slowed (bpm: 82.1±6.8 vs. 87.6±7.4, 81.3±6.1 vs. 85.6±8.3, bothP 0.05).Conclusions Compared with norepinephrine, terlipressin for ARDS patients with septic shock is more conducive to restrict fluid load, improve the renal perfusion and increase urine output. However, in both groups therewas no significant difference in the efficiency of stabilizing hemodynamics, shortening the duration of mechanical ventilation, reducing ICU or hospital days and decreasing 28-day mortality.

The value of end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure combined passive leg raising test on volume responsiveness assessment in shocked patients post cardiac operation / 中华危重病急救医学

Objective To assess the value of end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure (PETCO2) combined passive leg raising (PLR) test on volume responsiveness assessment in shocked patients post cardiac operation.Methods A prospective,self-controlled,and observational study was conducted.The shocked patients post cardiac operation undergoing complete mechanical ventilation admitted to Department of Critical Care Medicine of First Affiliated Hospital of College of Medicine,Zhejiang University from June 2014 to October 2015 were enrolled.PETCO2 and hemodynamic parameters including stroke volume variation (SVV),cardiac index (CI),mean arterial pressure (MAP) monitored by a pulse indicator continuous cardiac output (PiCCO) were determined before and after PLR and volume expansion (VE).Volume responsiveness was defined as an increase in CI (△ CI) of 15％ or greater after VE,namely response group (△ CI ≥ 15％) and non-response group (△ CI ＜ 15％).The value of PLR-induced PETCO2 change (△PETCO2 PLH) to predict volume responsiveness was evaluated by receiver operating.characteristic curves (ROC).Results Among the 41 patients enrolled,21 had volume responsiveness (response group),and 20 had no responsiveness (non-response group).After PLR,the changes in CI and PETCO2 were both significantly increased in the response group compared with non-response group [△ CI:(13.5 ± 4.6)％ vs.(3.6± 3.5)％,△ PETCO2:(7.4 ± 3.4)％ vs.(2.8 ± 2.5)％,both P ＜ 0.05].△ PETCO2 PLR and baseline SVV were positively correlated with PLR-induced CI change (△ CI PLR) (r1 =0.50,r2 =0.38,both P ＜ 0.05).VE-induced PETCO2 change (△ PETCO2 VE),baseline SVV and △ CI PLR were positively correlated with VE-induced CI (△ CI VE) (r1 =0.58,r2 =0.56 and r3 =0.84,all P ＜ 0.01).The area under ROC curve (AUC) of △ PETCO2 PLR was 0.875±0.054 [95％ confidence interval (95％CI) =0.769-0.981,P ＜ 0.05].△ PETCO2 PLR ≥ 5.8％ predicted volume responsiveness with sensitivity of 76.2％ and specificity of 90.0％.AUC of △CI PLR was 0.933±0.036 (95％CI =0.862-1.000,P ＜ 0.05).△CI PLR ≥ 10.4％ predicted volume responsiveness with sensitivity of 81.0％ and specificity of 90.0％.AUC of baseline SVV was 0.831 ±0.066 (95％CI =0.702-0.960,P ＜ 0.05).Baseline SVV ≥ 12.5％ predicted volume responsiveness with sensitivity of 85.7％ and specificity of 75.0％.Conclusion The change in PETCO2 induced by PLR is a convenient,reliable and non-invasive indicator to predict volume responsiveness in shocked patients post cardiac operation with mechanical ventilation.

The value of end -tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure in fluid resuscitation in severe acute pancreatitis patients / 中国基层医药

Objective To investigate the value of end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure (PET CO2 )in fluid resuscitation in severe acute pancreatitis(SAP)patients.Methods SAP patients under mechanical ventilation with the need of a fluid challenge test were included.Hemodynamic parameter cardiac index(CI)and PET CO2 were conducted before and after the fluid challenge test.The value of ΔPET CO2 was used to predict fluid responsiveness. Results Totally 43 patients with SAP were prospectively recruited.31 patients had volume responsiveness, 12 patients had no volume responsiveness.Compared with no volume responsiveness group,volume responsiveness group led to a greater increase in ΔCI[(0.9 ±0.3)vs.(0.2 ±0.3),t =3.24,P <0.05]and ΔPET CO2 [(4.1 ± 1.9)vs.(0.7 ±1.2),t =4.01,P <0.05].ΔPET CO2 and ΔCI were correlated(r =0.74,P <0.05).The area under ROC curve of ΔPET CO2 was 0.872(95% CI 0.754 ~0.923,P <0.05).An increase of 5% in ΔPET CO2 predicted fluid responsiveness with a sensitivity of 86.7%,and specificity of 89.5%.Conclusion The change of ΔPET CO2 induced by fluid challenge test is an effective way to predict fluid responsiveness in SAP patients.

Volume responsiveness assessment by transthoracic echocardiography and the application in pediatric intensive care unit / 中国小儿急救医学

Fluid resuscitation is the primary step in the management of acute circulation failure,aims to make a significant increase in cardiac output,and then providing adequate blood perfusion for peripheral tissues.According to Frank-Starling curve,the positive outcome only occurs in patients within a certain range of cardiac function,while in other conditions fluid overload would immediately increase the mortality. Distinguish-ing volume responders form non-responders effectively is still a serious problem common to adult and pediatric physicians at intensive care unit.Volume responsiveness assessment using transthoracic echocar-diography has become a research hotspot during the past few years,this review aims to make a summary of those findings as well as the present situation in pediatric field.

The assessment of ultrasonic measurement of superior vena cava blood flow for the volume responsiveness of patients with mechanical ventilation / 中华危重病急救医学

Objective To approach the evaluative effect of respiratory variation of superior vena cava peak flow velocity measured using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) on fluid responsiveness in patients with mechanical ventilation.Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted.All mechanical ventilated critically ill patients whose fluid therapy was planned due to hypovolemia in Department of Critical Care Medicine of Beijing Tongren Hospital of Capital Medical University from April 2011 to April 2013 were enrolled.Volume expansion was performed with 500 mL Linger solution within 30 minutes.Patients were classified as responders if pulse pressure variation (PPV) increased ≥ 13％ before volume expansion.The respiratory variation in superior vena cava peak velocity was calculated as the difference between maximum and minimum values of velocity in peak A,peak S and peak D over a single respiratory circle,and their variations (ΔA,ΔS,ΔD) were also calculated.The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) was plotted to assess the evaluative effect of respiratory variation of superior vena cava peak velocity on fluid responsiveness.Results Twenty-seven patients were enrolled in this study.Volume expansion increased PPV ≥ 13％ happened in 14 patients (responders).The velocity of superior vena cava in peak A,peak S,peak D was significantly increased after volume expansion compared with that before volume expansion in responders [peak A (cm/s):34.6 ± 2.2 vs.31.3 ±2.1,t=-2.493,P=0.027; peak S (cm/s):39.1 ± 1.3 vs.35.3 ±2.1,t=-2.564,P=0.024; peak D (cm/s):28.1 ± 1.2 vs.23.3 ± 1.4,t=-4.995,P=0.000],but there was no significant difference in ΔA,ΔS and ΔD between before and after volume expansion.The ΔA,ΔS and ΔD were positively correlated with PPV (r＝0.040,P=0.854; r=0.350,P=0.074; r=0.749,P=0.000).The area under ROC curve (AUC) of peak S was 0.36 [95％ confidence interval (95％CI):0.11-0.52],but the AUC of ΔS was 0.68 (95％CI 0.47-0.89),the AUC of peak D was 0.41 (95％CI 0.19-0.63),but the AUC of ΔD was 0.95 (95％CI 0.86-1.00),so the aberration rate of superior vena cava in respiration was better than the flow rate in superior vena cava.When the cut-off value of ΔS was 20.7％ for predicting fluid responsiveness,the sensitivity was 78.6％ and the specificity was 61.5％.When the cut-off value of ΔD was 12.7％ for predicting fluid responsiveness,the sensitivity was 92.0％ and the specificity was 92.3％.Conclusion Respiratory variations in superior vena cava peak velocity measured by TTE could assess fluid responsiveness in patients with mechanical ventilation.

An application of arterial pressure-based cardiac output measurements in fluid management strategies of critically ill patients / 中华危重病急救医学

Objective To discuss the clinical significance of fluid management of severe patients according to arterial pressure-based cardiac output (APCO) monitoring volume responsiveness index.Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted.The severe patients were selected from the intensive care unit (ICU) of the First Hospital of Jilin University from June 1st,2012 to December 31st,2013.The hemodynamic parameters were monitored by APCO,and the fluid resuscitation was managed by stroke volume variation (SVV) and passive leg-raising test (PLR) when the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ) score ≥ 15,heart rate ＞ 100 bpm with the result that the preload and heart function could not be evaluated.The heart rate,SVV,lactic acid (Lac) and central venous pressure (CVP) and curative effect were recorded before and after carrying out fluid management strategy.The criteria of clinical effective was defined as heart rate decreased and (or) stroke volume (SV) increased ≥ 10％,accompanied by blood Lac and SVV decreased,other than,the cases did not meet above criteria were considered ineffective.Results Sixty-eight patients were enrolled in the study.① Before carrying out fluid management strategy:40 cases with CVP＞ 12 cmH2O (1 cmH2O=0.098 kPa),and 16 cases with 5-12 cmH2O,12 with ＜5 cmH2O.SVV＞13％ in 35 cases,SVV ＜ 13％ in 9 cases.PLR positive in 18 cases,and PLR negative in 6 cases.It was implicated that the patients with poor preload (SVV ＞ 13％ and PLR positive) accounted by 77.9％ (53/68).② There were 49 effective cases and 19 ineffective cases 4 hours after carrying out fluid management strategy,and the effective rate was 72.06％ (49/68).While there were 56 effective cases and 12 ineffective cases after 12 hours,and the total effective rate was 82.35％ (56/68).③ In effective group,heart rate,SVV,Lac after fluid management strategy were significantly lower than those before fluid management strategy [4 hours after fluid management strategy:heart rate (bpm) 112.45 ± 13.53 vs.129.55 ± 15.49,SVV (15.47 ± 6.32)％ vs.(21.20 ± 7.40)％,Lac (mmol/L) 4.16 ± 3.12 vs.6.21 ± 4.11 ; 12 hours after fluid management strategy:heart rate (bpm) 110.02 ± 13.92 vs.129.61 ± 14.93,SVV (14.61 ± 15.52)％ vs.(20.66 ± 7.40)％,Lac (mmol/L) 3.35 ± 2.26 vs.6.11 ± 4.02,P＜0.05 or P＜0.01],while there was no significant difference in those markers between before and after fluid management strategy in ineffective group [4 hours after fluid management strategy:heart rate (bpm) 119.53 ± 11.68 vs.125.79 ± 11.58,SVV (16.95 ±6.48)％ vs.(18.47 ±4.96)％,Lac (mmol/L) 5.55 ± 3.80 比 6.54 ± 3.72 ; 12 hours after fluid management strategy:heart rate (bpm) 115.92 ± 11.71 vs.123.40 ± 11.59,SVV (17.17 ± 6.09)％ vs.(19.42 ± 8.25)％,Lac (mmol/L) 6.33 ± 3.40 vs.7.21 ± 3.81,all P＞ 0.05].CVP only at 12 hours after fluid management strategy in effective group was significantly higher than that before fluid management strategy (cmH2O:12.88 ± 3.38 vs.11.27 ± 4.97,P＜0.05).Conclusion SVV monitored by APCO is a good indicator of volume responsiveness index,which can be used as an important reference combined with PLR for fluid management of severe patients.

The role of end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure in fluid responsiveness assessment in septic shock patient / 中华内科杂志

Objective To assess whether end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure (PET CO2) can predict the fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients.Methods Septic shock patients under mechanical ventilation without spontaneous breathing and with the need of a fluid challenge test were included in this study.Heart rate,central venous pressure,pulse pressure,PErCO2,and CI before and after the fluid challenge test were conducted in all the patients.Results Of the 48 septic shock patients included,34 had preload responsiveness,14 had no responsiveness.△CI and △PET CO2 after the fluid challenge test involume responders were (0.85 ± 0.47) L · min-1 · m-2 and (3.5 ± 2.5) mmHg respectively,which were higher than those in no volume responders (P ＜ 0.05).The fluid-induced changes in PET CO2 and CI were correlated (r =0.072,P ＜ 0.05).The AUCRoc of fluid challenge-induced △PET CO2 as the predictor for volume responsiveness was 0.943,and its sensitivity was 87.9％ and specificity was 93.4％ with a critical value of 5％.The AUCRoc of △PP as the predictor for volume responsiveness was 0.801,and its sensitivity was 68.1％ and specificity was 73.2％ with a critical value of 10％.Conclusion The changes of PETCO2 induced by a fluid challenge test can predict fluid responsiveness with reliability,and have a better sensitivity and specificity than the changes of PP.

The analysis of the sensitivity and specificity by pulmonary artery catheter and transesophageal echocar-diography regarding volume responsiveness in cardiac surgery / 临床麻醉学杂志

Objective To analyze the sensitivity and specificity of several volume parameters regarding volume responsiveness.The studied volume parameters include pulmonary artery obstruc-tion pressure (PAOP),central venous pressure (CVP),right ventricular end-diastolic volume (RV-EDV)measured by Swan-Ganz pulmonary artery catheter and left ventricular end-diastolic area (LVEDA),inferior vena cava diameter (IVC)measured by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Methods Twelve patients with ASA Ⅱ or Ⅲ,scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting were studied.After anesthesia induction,the TEE probe was put into the esophagus and Swan-Ganz cathe-ter was placed in right internal jugular venous.Measurements were made at the time before cutting the skin (T0 ),20 min after divorcing from cardiopulmonary bypass or finishing vascular anastomosis in off-pump surgery(T1 ),10 min after rapid infusion (T2 )and 30 min after rapid infusion (T3 ),re-spectively.Results The values of PAOP,IVC,LVEDA,COLVOT at time T2 increased significantly compared to those at time T1 (P <0.01).No obvious correlation (r=-0.298 5、r=-0.091 8、r=-0.243 6)was observed between △CVP、△PAOP、△RVEDV and △COLVOT (the difference between T2 and T1 );Meanwhile,△IVC and △LVEDA were well correlated to △COLVOT (r= 0.445 0、r=0.612 0).Using more than 1 5% change of COLVOT after volume expansion as definition of positive re-sponse,the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of CVP,PAOP,RVEDV,IVC and LVEDA were 0.389 (95% CI 0.035-0.743 ),0.458 (95% CI 0.109-0.807 ),0.333 (95% CI 0-0.671 ), 0.903 (95% CI 0.701-1.000 ) and 0.889 (95% CI 0.661-1.000 ), respectively. Conclusion PAOP,IVC,LVEDA,CO are more sensitive to the change of volume;while CVP and RVEDV have weak responses to volume changes.This indicates that IVC and RVEDA have more ad-vantage to estimate cardiac output increase and guide volume therapy.

The clinical study about fluid resuscitation and management through Vigileo with passive leg raising test in shock patients / 中华急诊医学杂志

Objective To compare the procotol of EGDT +Pt (cv-a ) CO2 with EGDT in fluid resuscitation and management after evaluate fluid responsiveness in shock patients by Vigileo and passive leg raising test.Metheds Prospectively collect patients who meet the criteria between 2013.5.1-2013.1 1.30 in our ICU.Randomly (random number)divided into Vigileo group (first evaluate the fluid responsiveness then give EGDT +Pt (cv-a) CO2 ) and CVP group (give EGDT).Compare the hospital mortality and morbility of MODS,the volume given in the first 6 hours and the first 7 days,consume of blood products , the ICU and hospital stay.Results Collected 46 patients,Vigileo group (21 )and CVP group (25 ). There’s no significant difference between groups at baseline.In the first 6 hours the CVP group had received more fluids (3656.281678.57 vs. 2639.141326.59 ) mL, P =0.03;and more blood products (573.00172.57 vs. 190.4770.82)mL,P=0.04,respictivily.Vigileo group significantly short the ICU stay ,(6.384.34 vs. 12.165.77)d,P=0.04.But there’s no significant difference in hospital motality and the morbility of MODS.The ROC of Age ,the accumulative volume of balance in 7 days,APACHEⅡscore in the first day to predict death is 0.84 (0.68-0.99)、0.82 (0.69-0.95)、0.80 (0.66-0.94),all P>0.05,respectively.By 7 days the accumulative volume of balance 3454.51mL as cutoff to predict death with the sensitivity of 0.67,specificity of 0.84.Conclusions 1.Given EGDT +Pt (cv-a) CO2 after evaluate the fluid responsiveness can reduce fluid and blood products given in the first 6 hours,significantly short the ICU stay,without worsen the tissue flow or increase the morbility of MODS;2.Consecutive positive fluid balance is a risk factor about poor prognosis,and also a sensitive indicator to predict death.

Choque séptico: Actualización en la monitorización hemodinámica / Septic shock in ICU: update in hemodynamic monitoring

Si bien los principios básicos para el diagnóstico y la monitorización hemodinámica como los pilares terapéuticos del niño con choque séptico se mantienen en el tiempo, es innegable que en las últimas décadas se han incorporado nuevos y trascendentes conceptos, por lo que es importante que el médico tratante de las unidades de cuidados intensivos tenga conocimiento de ellos a cabalidad. La monitorización hemodinámica es una herramienta que no solamente permite detectar el origen de la inestabilidad hemodinámica sino también guiar el tratamiento y evaluar su efectividad. La resucitación con fluidos debe ser el primer paso en la reanimación del paciente hemodinámicamente inestable. Sin embargo, la determinación clínica del volumen intravascular puede ser, en ocasiones, difícil de establecer en el paciente crítico. Las presiones de llenado cardiaco no son capaces de predecir la respuesta a fluidos. Los indicadores dinámicos de respuesta a fluidos evalúan el cambio en el volumen eyectivo durante la ventilación mecánica; de este modo, se valora la curva de Frank-Starling del paciente. Mediante la prueba de fluido es posible evaluar el grado de la reserva de precarga que se puede utilizar para aumentar el volumen eyectivo. En esta revisión se actualiza la información disponible sobre la monitorización hemodinámica básica y funcional.

In recent decades, new and important concepts have emerged for the diagnosis and management of the pediatric patient with septic shock, although the basic principles have remained similar over time. Attending physicians in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) must be fully aware of these concepts in order to improve patient care in the critical care unit. Hemodynamic monitoring is a tool that not only allows detection of the source of hemodynamic instability but also guides treatment and assesses its effectiveness. Fluid loading is considered the first step in the resuscitation of hemodynamically unstable patients. Nevertheless, clinical determination of the intravascular volume can be extremely difficult in a critically ill patient. Studies performed have demonstrated that cardiac filling pressures are unable to predict fluid responsiveness. Dynamic tests of volume responsiveness use the change in stroke volume during mechanical ventilation assessing the patients' Frank-Starling curve. Through fluid challenge the clinician can assess whether the patient has a preload reserve that can be used to increase the stroke volume. In this review we updated the available information on basic and functional hemodynamic monitoring.

The role of stroke volume variation in predicting the volume responsiveness of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock / 中华急诊医学杂志

Objective To assess the role of stroke volume variation (SVV) in predicting the volume responsiveness of mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Method A total of 28 mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis and septic shock were admitted from January 2009 to March 2010. Every patient was treated with volume loading test. Cardiac index (CI), stroke volume index (SVI), systemic vascular resistance (SVR) and SVV were measured non-invasively by Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor (USCOM) device.Patients with an increase in CI ＞ 12% and ＜ 12% after volume loading test were classified as responders and nonresponders, respectively. The comparisons between these two sorts of patients were assessed by using two sample Student' s t -test, and comparisons between changes before and after volume loading test were assessed by using a paired Student's t -test. The roles of SVV, central venous pressure (CVP) and the changes of CVP (△CVP) after fluid administration in predicting volume responsiveness were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results Before volume loading test, the SVV was higher in responders in comparison with non-responders [(18.2 ± 4.7)% vs. (12.7 ± 4.2)%, P = 0.003] and the CVP was not significantly different between two groups [(10.2±4.0) cmH2O vs. (10.8±4.8) cmH2O, P ＞0.05]. After volume loading test,the CVP was lower in responders [(2.9 ± 3.1 ) cmH2O vs. (5.3 ± 2.7) cmH2O, P = 0.003]. The areas under the ROC curves (AUC) were 0.836 (95% CI:0.680 ～ 0.992,P = 0.003),0.549 (95% CI:0.329 ～ 0.768,P = 0.662)and 0.762 (95% CI:0.570 ～ 0.953,P = 0.019)for SVV, CVP and △CVP, respectively. The 15.5% of SVV value had the 84.6% of sensitivity and 80% of specificity for prediction of volume responsiveness. Conclusions SVV can serve as a valid indicator of predicting volume responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis and septic shock and it is more reliable than conventional indicators such as CVP and/△CVP.